Bonfire of the profanities

What are the British, Australian, and New Zealand governments doing to stop air pollution?

Bonfire of the profanities

Postby Wilberforce » Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:44 pm

November 5th, 2013
Bonfire of the profanities

by Chris Sherrington

The whizz and pop of fireworks; sparklers; mulled wine; and of course gathering around the bonfire to keep warm: the annual celebrations on November 5th are a firm favourite in the Sherrington household. For my children it’s all great fun and for me, Guy Fawkes Night evokes happy childhood memories of building and lighting bonfires with my grandfather. For those reasons, although I’m now aware of the damage unrestricted bonfires can do to our health, I wouldn’t want to deny my children the same enjoyment. Refusing them a bonfire on November 5th would be a crime equal to pretending the Tooth Fairy was bankrupt, or setting the dogs on the Easter Bunny. But I would like to see the time around November 5th kept as an exception to a wider crackdown on polluting bonfires at other times of the year.

Ce n’est pas un bon fire

Since the passing of the Clean Air Act in 1956, Britain’s air has indeed become cleaner. No longer are we gripped by killer smogs or showered with soot from thousands of domestic coal fires – although the trend in recent years towards domestic wood burning may be rolling back some of these gains. The humble bonfire, however, is a different, and altogether less regulated, beast. Research commissioned for Defra defined a bonfire as:

“An outdoor fire, either celebratory or for destroying waste”

and pointed out that:

“bonfires discharge emissions at ground level in an uncontrolled manner”.

The uncontrolled burning means that combustion is often poor. At the start, the material may contain a lot of moisture and produce a good deal of smoke as it burns and smoulders at low temperatures. As it catches, the bonfire will burn hotter and cleaner, but towards the end of its life, ash restricts the flow of oxygen and leads to increased amounts of smoke and particulates.

Because the smoke is emitted at ground level, it is not quickly and widely dispersed in the way that it is from a chimney. We all know what it’s like to have streaming, stinging eyes when the wind changes direction and we get caught in the smoke from a bonfire – but few of us realise just how bad for us this smoke can be.

Wood – suggest you avoid

A simple domestic bonfire burning clean wood and dry leaves is probably the least worrying kind of open burning, but all the evidence indicates that any exposure to woodsmoke can be bad for us. Studies by Zelikoff, Danilesen, Bolling and numerous others indicate that wood smoke is high in particulate matter that causes severe damage to the heart and lungs, including lung cancer. A Mexican study found that long term exposure to woodsmoke may have the same effects as persistent tobacco use. Smoking is regulated for health reasons, and we seek to prevent children being exposed to tobacco smoke – yet we cheerfully let them gather around the bonfire!

However, November 5th only comes round once a year, and the smoke isn’t something many of us find addictive – so perhaps we shouldn’t be too concerned. Moreover, when assembling firewood for the occasion, I would imagine that most people at least try not to burn anything too unpleasant. After all, the main focus is on entertainment rather than dealing with waste.

Unfortunately, bonfires do take place at other times of the year, often with entertainment, or indeed warmth, very much a subsidiary concern. According to the Defra study quoted above, domestic and trade bonfires can commonly comprise municipal and industrial waste, including car body components. The (inevitably largely unknown) mix of materials being combusted may lead to the release of dioxins – which can be highly toxic to humans even in very small quantities. In this respect the Defra report further notes that:

“Dioxins are created when metal containing ashes are held at moderate temperatures between 200°C and 350°C in contact with incompletely combusted organic matter such as soot. Smouldering bonfires provide the correct conditions for dioxin formation.”

Most ashes do contain trace metals, and a report for Defra in 2010 on sources of dioxins stated that:

“There is a growing body of evidence that small scale combustion of waste is the dominate source in the UK now that industrial sources have been effectively regulated.”

No flaming red tape?

Of course, there is regulation covering bonfires, but it is not resulting in clear messages about what is and is not allowed. Councils give widely varying guidance on the legislation, and enforcement is problematic. While councils regularly follow up on complaints, very few result in any meaningful action.

Ceci n’est pas un bon fire: backyard burning releases dangerous pollutants. Photo by Janna Karaste, via Wikimedia Commons.

The Defra bonfire report found that “From a total of 29,147 complaints made in 2000, only 300 notices were served and five prosecutions brought to court.” The problem seems to be that councils must prove that an individual caused a statutory nuisance, which is not straightforward.

The study included the results of a survey in which local authorities suggested ways that bonfires might be better dealt with. Because of enforcement difficulties, most councils currently take an education-led approach, which does not seem to be very effective. 39% wanted new powers to introduce bans on home burning for certain types of waste. However, this might still lead to enforcement difficulties associated with proving that banned waste was involved, and an outright ban would probably be far more effective at reducing air pollution. 33% wanted clearer legislation, such as an extension of the Clean Air Act 1993 to include a ban on dark smoke emissions from domestic properties. Also, the use of bylaws was suggested as a control on bonfires in areas with air quality problems.

Ban fires?

In fact, I suspect the power to ban bonfires may already exist. The much amended Environmental Protection Act 1990 says that persons (including householders):

”Shall not treat, keep or dispose of controlled waste [or extractive waste] in a manner likely to cause pollution of the environment or harm to human health”.

So technically, since commercial and household waste (including garden waste) is controlled waste, and bonfires represent both a source of pollution to the environment and a danger to human health, doesn’t that mean they are prohibited by law?

Whether or not this interpretation is correct, it is certainly not widely shared, and without stern guidance or new legislation, no serious restriction on our national proclivity for burning things outdoors seems likely. Restrictions on backyard burning, even if just in urban areas, might seem a bit like cancelling Christmas, but the problems associated with them are too important to ignore. For our own health, we really should be taking this issue seriously, and that means stepping up the legislation.

Seeking to ban bonfires on bonfire night is to my mind a non-starter, for good reason. But perhaps a workable proposal would be make November 5th special, while cracking down on polluting bonfires at other times of the year. Given that Guy Fawkes Night celebrates the successful uncovering of a plot against Parliament, perhaps one of our more populist MPs, particularly one who regularly expresses concern about back yard burning, might want to champion this cause?

Chris Sherrington

• The Surgeon General has determined that there is no safe level of exposure to ambient smoke!

• If you smell even a subtle odor of smoke, you are being exposed to poisonous and carcinogenic chemical compounds!

• Even a brief exposure to smoke raises blood pressure, (no matter what your state of health) and can cause blood clotting, stroke, or heart attack in vulnerable people. Even children experience elevated blood pressure when exposed to smoke!

• Since smoke drastically weakens the lungs' immune system, avoiding smoke is one of the best ways to prevent colds, flu, bronchitis, or risk of an even more serious respiratory illness, such as pneumonia or tuberculosis! Does your child have the flu? Chances are they have been exposed to ambient smoke!
User avatar
Posts: 6096
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:36 pm
Location: USA

Return to Australian, N.Z., U.K. Environmental Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest