Jan. 2002: Fight to clean up Kokkari Restaurant on 200 Jackson St, SF.wood burning in San Francisco Meeting Jan.11, 2002
Please call
Brian Browne 415-399-1642 also see these websites:
Aethalometer
monitoring in Downtown San Franciscohttp://www.mageesci.com/sf/downtown_sf.htm
These are great charts of Wood smoke along with city living. Look
at Christmas Eve. See how the smoke pollution fills the air and
then it doesn't clear out until early morning. This is early data
but very helpful.
for raw data: You will be able to pull off the most recent scores from www.h2oecon.com/consolidated.xls as Brian posts them.
Mr. Browne:
I have informed my Director and Medical Director, Jack Breslin and
Dr.Rajiv Bhatia regarding the Jan 11, meeting. I truly hope that Bay Area Air
quality will attend since they are the only agency that oversees, monitors and regulates smoke emmissions. At the meeting you may want to ask Sup. Peskin to introduce legislation into the San Francisco Health Code authorizing the Health Dept to monitor and regulate smoke emmissions from restaurants. Until that is done, BAAQMD is the only agency with the
authority to modify the smoke.
Lisa O'Malley
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:23 AM
Subject: Air pollution monitoring
Dear Colleagues:
> Did you receive the e-mail that I sent on 1/1/02? - in case
not, I have
> appended it. I converted the numerical data top charts and
posted them on
> a website.
> Tony Hansen
>
>
> At 07:00 AM 1/4/02 -0800, Brian Browne wrote:
> >People:
> >You will be able to pull off the most recent scores from
> >www.h2oecon.com/consolidated.xls as I post them (if you
spawn XLS).
Thiswill be more efficient than the www site. Please review and
analyze. If
100 is a clean city and we are seeing these scores (la on a smog
day is
10,000) -- what are our chances of survival? what do these data
mean?
Please help with your analysis. Do we have a problem? If yes?
How bad?
The smells are intolerable, but what does that mean to our health
in the
context of these readings?
> >
> >www.h2oecon.com/pollution2.html works -- but is slow
and cumbersome
> >
> = = = = = = =
>
> Dear Mr. Browne:
>
> Thanks for sending me the aethalometer data. I have converted
it to
charts and posted them at the following website for your convenience:
http://www.mageesci.com/sf/downtown_sf.htm
If you share this with colleagues or neighbors, please be very
sure to
make
> it clear that this data is *not* official, nor conclusive,
nor should it
be
used one way or the other to prove or disprove a point. It is
simply a
display of the numbers that you sent me. In particular, please
check with
David Fairley of the BAAQMD to ascertain his organization's position
on
this study.
>
> In general, the data show that while it is highly likely
that smoke from
> the restaurant is indeed reaching your balcony in the evenings,
> nevertheless the numbers are not high enough to trigger an
immediate
alarm.
> Pollution becomes a 'nuisance' long before it becomes a 'health
hazard'
> and I am not an expert on these determinations. The black
trace of the
> data is quantitative for 'Elemental' carbon particles and
these numbers
are
> well within typical levels for an urban environment. The
"blue" trace of
> the aethalometer indicates the presence of certain categories
of aromatic
> organic compounds, but does *not* give a quantitation, as
there are many
> different organics each with a different UV response. Organics
are
> indicated from time to time in the aethalometer data but
it would require
> detailed chemical sampling and analysis to determine exactly
which
> compounds in what quantities. Wood smoke does indeed contain
toxic and
> carcinogenic compounds, but the determination of these requires
exact
> chemical speciation. The aethalometer data indicate that
these *types* of
> compounds may very well be present at certain times of the
day that
> correspond with your observations of activity at the restaurant.
>
> If you would like to send more data, I will convert it to
charts and post
> it to the site. I hope that this helps.
>
> Best regards
> Tony Hansen
Brian Browne
To: Lisa O'Malley
<Lisa.O'Malley@sfdph.org>
> > 01/04/02 07:30 dburns@arb.ca.gov
> > AM Subject: 1.04.02 Pollution
> > Lisa -- We have readings. We have people complaining.
We have numerous
> > visual sightings, including ARB. I have sent this out
to a number of
> > people, hopefully for analysis. What other proof do
we require? When must
> Kokkari defend their abuse of our air instead of us having
this onus of proof?
We need the SFHD to protect us. What more evidence does SFHD require
to
issue a health citation and/or request mitigation equipment? Can
you suggest
anyone at USEPA? Please call. 415-399-1642. Even with rain and
some
wind Kokkari are overwhelming me and the readings seem to validate
this
conclusion. Now it is not just my recall, but a number objectively
derived.
The correlation appears significant.
Brian Browne
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: SF HEALTH DEPT. REPLY 1.04.02 Pollution
> Dear Ms. O'Malley,
> Thank you for your email. The correlative readings from the
air monitor
and
> Kokkari's operation appear significant (positive). The high
pollution
levels
> may well be untenable for many of us due to age and existing
infirmities.
> We live in a "gas chamber" type environment due
to the Financial Wall.
> Little breeze penetrates these canyons. Little relief is
found. We are
held
> hostage to environmental plunder. There are many pollution
sources, but
none
> with the "production capacity" of Kokkari. We are
amazed that the SFHD
does
> not already have an ordinance granting them authority to
protect us from
> such environmental excesses. With the exception of Dr. Fairley
of the
> BAAQMD, many of us have been disappointed with the BAAQMD.
I even
contacted
> the State of California Air Resources Board for relief. However,
I will
ask
> Supervisor Peskin to ensure BAAQMD representation at this
meeting. We will
> also ask Supervisor Peskin to follow your (SFHD) suggestion
regarding SFHD
> having accountability for restaurant pollution. Many in
our neighborhood
> demand an absolute ban on wood burning devices at restaurants.
This must
> require retrofitting at their expense. We also need a determination
as to
> how the infrastructure impact tax should be applied to people
who use
local
> infrastructure for mainly non-local businesses. We look forward
to seeing
> you at the meeting.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Brian Browne
> ----- Original Message -----
> > > People:
> > > You will be able to pull off the most recent scores
from
> > > www.h2oecon.com/consolidated.xls as I post them
(if you spawn XLS).
> > This
> > > will be more efficient than the www site. Please
review and analyze.
If
> > 100
> > > is a clean city and we are seeing these scores
(la on a smog day is
> > > 10,000) -- what are our chances of survival? what
do these data mean?
> > > Please help with your analysis. Do we have a problem?
If yes? How bad?
> > The
> > > smells are intolerable, but what does that mean
to our health in the
> > context
> > > of these readings?
> > >
> > > www.h2oecon.com/pollution2.html works -- but is
slow and cumbersome
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 06:23:03 -0800
From: Brian Browne <h2oecon@pacbell.net>
Subject: Metering pollution
To: Burning Issues <pm10mary@mail.mcn.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
TO BURNING ISSUES - A VOICE OF SANITY IN A WORLD OF UNNECCESSARY
WOOD SMOKE
POLLUTION
www.burningissues.org
Dear Mary,
Supervisor Aaron Peskin will hold a Town Hall meeting on 1.11.02
at Togo's
restaurant at the corner of Jackson and Battery Street at 7.00
PM. Flyers
are being printed in English and Chinese. We now have a division
of labor --
I will focus on the monitoring, others are helping with distribution
and
organization. We appear to be gaining community momentum. The
options of
not organizing are bleak.
I am putting the pollution recordings on the www.h2oecon.com/pollution2.html
site (slow to load -- runs from server software off my PC). These
scores
appear to correlate with this immense restaurant's operation (early
morning
to late at night). No longer do we have to rely on "recall"
or official
"reaction" time and "subjective" (chasing
butterflies) judgements. At
least from one small spot we know the status of the air we breathe.
I put
your site on the above page. I will ask Andrew Rand to mention
your site at
the meeting. We understand that your organization also needs financial
support. Hopefully that issue can be raised also.
The scores over 10,000 amaze me -- so many -- and the correlation
with my
upper respiratory discomfort and smell of smoke is uncanny. I
feel nauseous
and check the meter and it is high. Should we move? Do we live
in a danger
zone? Please give us your input? Your www.burningissues.org site
is a
voice of sanity calling out in the wilderness.
Thank you,
Brian Browne
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 11:44:58 -0800
From: Brian Browne <h2oecon@pacbell.net>
Subject: BATTLE FOR LIFE Re: December 27th 2001
POLLUTION! POLLUTION! POLLUTION!
Please make sure that we get a good group here for Supervisor
Peskin's visit
on the 11th. Invite people. Supervisor Peskin will come initially
to my
apartment. Iris is absolutely correct about last night. Black
Carbon and
Ultraviolet readings were high. I am following up on the ballot
proposal
idea to ban all wood burning fireplaces in our "gas chamber"
environment.
The high-rise buildings (FD) create a "wall" which under
most conditions
stop normal air circulation. The main pollution offender in our
neighborhood
is Kokkari. The town-houses (54) penthouses(8), commons, and other
smaller
restaurants do cause a problem. However, we have lived with them,
albeit
sometimes to our discomfort, for years. It was only when Kokkari
-- the
"environmental bully" appeared -- that our ecosystem
was completely
compromised. One must wonder how complete the environmental impact
study
really was for Kokkari? It opened in 1998 and there was then available
a
lot of information as to the negative externalities associated
with second
hand smoke. People can't smoke inside Kokkari? Kokkari can smoke
inside our
environment? Many believe if these apartments were truly rented
to
long-term residents as in the past, that there would be many more
complaints. Our residential base is contracting. The de-"hotelization"
of
our complex would help us in this fight. De-hotelization would
also make a
lot more LT rental space available in SF. The current real and
most present
danger is overuse and POLLUTION of our air by Kokkari Restaurant,
200
Jackson St., SF 91111.
Also, we are hoping Supervisor Peskin will be able to tell
us if after the
fires at Kokkari, which required roof repairs, were permits to
repair
required? If yes, were these permits obtained? If not? The fireplace
fire
in 1999 took days to be repaired. The pizza chimney fire in 2001
was
repaired the next day. We have asked Wing Lau, Chief Building
Inspector,
SFBD, to answer these questions. No answer as of writing. I also
raised it
at a BIC meeting. No answer. An answer would help us understand
how SF
works.
On another issue - we all applaud the efforts of Burning Issues
at
www.burningissues.org - and ask that you support them in their
efforts to
give us a totally clean environment for the entire state. Please
visit Ms.
Rozenberg's excellent website and assist if you can.
BB
----- Original Message -----
From: Iris Berman <irisberman@yahoo.com>
To: andrew rand <syrand@hotmail.com>; Brian Browne <h2oecon@pacbell.net>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: Fwd: December 27th 2001
>
> Iris Berman <irisberman@yahoo.com> wrote: Date: Fri,
28 Dec 2001
11:07:12 -0800 (PST)
> From: Iris Berman
> Subject: December 27th 2001
> To: Aaron Peskin
>
>
> The fumes from Kokkari Rest. were at their highest last night.
At 5 pm it
was starting to build up and so I left for a few hours. I put
my new Sharper
Image air purifier on High and when I returned approx. 6:30pm
it was as if I
did not have the machine on. I eventually had to close the windows.
I had
both of my machines going on high as the smoke would have come
in
>
> I did not move to San Francisco to live in a closed apt.
with no ai rand
air purifiers going full blast.
>
> If you were around when Square One was in business, the neighbors
(condo
owners) complained about the smoke and you know what--they did
something
about it. Before Kokkari was here,the other restaurant also took
care of the
smoke. Do the owners of Kokkari have so much influence that they
can get
away with doing whatever they please. Even Burger King has better
ventilation.
>
> Looking forward to your visit on the 11th of Jan. You will
be able to
smell for yourself.
>
> Iris Berman 421 8108