Ban chimineas now, not in 2015

Personal Situations - Problems or Solutions.

Moderator: pm2.5mary

Ban chimineas now, not in 2015

Postby Wilberforce » Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:31 pm

Ban chimineas now, not in 2015

Barrie Advance

LETTER - It was encouraging to read in your recent edition regarding backyard solid fuel-burning appliances that the Community Services Committee recommends councillors approve banning these menaces.

This has been a long time coming.

Anyone educated in this regard, or who suffers from these appliances, cannot understand why it has taken Barrie City Council so long to make the right decision. The health of the citizens of Barrie has been neglected for too long. Why are other members of council not listening to the fire chief? It is not only a matter of dollars and cents, but more importantly the health of the entire city.

In saying that, I have to say a huge thank you to Coun. John Brassard for his attention to this matter over that past few years; and also Coun. Barry Ward.

They do their homework and “get it”.

In an article written several years ago, Dr. Wayne Ott, Ph.D, of Stanford University, states: “The largest single source of outdoor fine particles (PM2.5) entering into our homes in many American cities is our neighbor’s fireplace or wood stove. Despite the ineffectiveness of a fireplace in heating a home, only a few hours of wood burning in a single home at night can raise fine particle concentrations in dozens of surrounding home throughout the neighborhood and cause PAH concentrations higher than 2,000 ng/m3.”

Dr. Ott also states: “For those on the receiving end of the neighbor’s fireplace or wood smoke, it is often similar to living with a chain smoker.”

Studies show that people who heat their homes with wood have more respiratory problems than those who don’t.

Smoke particles also invade neighboring homes. Research shows that children in wood burning neighborhoods are more likely to have lung and breathing problems, according to Focus on Wood Smoke Pollution – Washington State Department of Ecology.

The EPA estimates that the lifetime cancer risk from wood stove smoke is 12 times greater than that from an equal volume of second hand tobacco smoke, according to The Health Effects of Wood Smoke, Washington State Department of Ecology).

According to Health Canada, breathing wood smoke in any quantity is not healthy for anyone. The most effective thing you can do to reduce the risk of health effects from wood smoke is to switch to a different heat source, such as natural gas or oil.

The Montreal Health Department states that a conventional wood stove emits as much fine-particle pollution in nine hours as a car travelling 18,000 km.

In 2008, the Supreme Court of Ontario ruled that wood smoke can be a threat to health and awarded a Hamilton couple $270,000 in damages and legal costs.

Why are some members of Barrie City Council, including Mayor Jeff Lehman, dragging their feet on this matter?

Surely they have children they want to protect, to say nothing of the citizens of Barrie who do know the facts and suffer from these horrible appliances emitting toxins and carcinogens into the air.

I believe it is illegal to leave a car idling for a few minutes, and to smoke in a car with children present. Why then is it acceptable to have backyard solid fuel-burning appliances while our children and grandchildren play outside in the so-called fresh air?

Why are we considering a ban January 1 2015?

Now is the time.

Doris Falkeisen
source ... t-in-2015/

Nothing Like the Smell of a Crackling Fire on an Icy Winter Evening

Mar 4th, 2013 by wintercow20

My students in science tell me that our sense of smell is perhaps the strongest inducer to memory than of any of the five senses. I tend to agree. There are some smells that are so ingrained in my head that I cannot help but be taken back to when I first remember being exposed to them. But of all of those smells, perhaps there is nothing more pleasant and evokes more fond memories than the smell of a crackling wood fire on an icy winter evening. It perhaps started when I was a Boy Scout, having to sleep in a bottomless canvas tent on ice in the dead of winter, just dreaming of warm cocoa and oatmeal that our warm scout leaders were preparing for when we “awoke” (no one quite sleeps in those conditions). It’s a smell I enjoyed last night as I trundled home around midnight and one of my neighbors must have been warming by their hearth.

Except … burning wood kills people and causes catastrophic injury.

It is certainly one of the most serious health risks that poor countries face. Indeed smoke from the burning of indoor solid fuels was the sixth leading cause of death and the fifth leading cause of disease within poor countries in the oughts. Here is an illustration of why:


Here is what the above World Health Organization Report says about this:

Indoor smoke from solid fuels More than half the world’s population still cooks with wood, dung, coal or agricultural residues on simple stoves or open fires. Especially under conditions
of limited ventilation, solid-fuel use leads to high exposures to indoor smoke and large associated health risks, particularly for women and children. Indoor smoke from solid-fuel use contains a range of potentially harmful substances, from carcinogens to small particulate matter, all of which cause damage to the lungs. Indoor smoke from solid fuel causes about 21% of lower respiratory infection deaths worldwide, 35% of chronic obstructive pulmonary deaths and about 3% of lung cancer deaths. Of these deaths, about 64% occur in low-income countries, especially in South-East Asia and Africa.

And this is surely not limited to poor countries. A very quick search of PubMed should be enough to convince you of this. You will find that smoke from wood fires is as toxic as the exhaust from vehicle tailpipes. You will find that inhalation of wood smoke produces similar impacts on your lungs as smoking cigarettes. You will find that smoke from wood fires leads to significantly more infection and other illness in children than for children not exposed to wood smoke. You will find wood smoke to be highly carcinogenic. Here is one of the many studies I pulled up to examine this. Couple the over 1 million deaths (and many more sicknesses) that occur in poor countries with the thousands of people who suffer lung disease, ear infection, and cancer from exposure to wood smoke in rich countries like the US, and it turns out that wood is among the most serious killers on earth.

People claim that burning wood is carbon neutral, because the dead trees would decay and release the CO2 anyway. But harvesting of trees surely contributes to climate change due to the impact on land use as a result of the harvest, and the actual harvesting activities themselves.

And we living in rich countries cannot be said to “need” to use wood for any purpose anymore. We have plenty of natural gas (cleaner). We have plenty of ways to generate electricity to distribute to people’s homes. The burning of wood in America is clearly a frivolous indulgence. And it’s a frivolous indulgence that kills and maims Americans by the thousands. My neighbor has been burning fires all winter and my son and I have battled coughs and colds all winter. Surely my neighbor’s smoke did not help this. And believe me, the smoke even gets in our house. It has been estimated that 70% of indoor air pollution comes from outside the home.

So, I’ll start taking “E”nviros seriously when they propose a ban on the burning of wood. And then I’d like to see the wood gestapo follow up with enforcing this. The problem of wood even here in America is far more serious than most risks that the “E”nviros claim to care about. It surely is a more serious threat to our health than fracking. It is surely a more serious threat to our health than whatever possible impacts Climate Change will throw at us. It is a problem that afflicts both rich and poor in America, so there shouldn’t be the same “indifference” that folks claim happens when some tragedy only befalls the poor. And since wood is burned from a large variety of sources, even here on my block, economists would argue that it is too costly for me to negotiate with all of the people who are hurting my lungs and eyes, so that Coasean bargains are ruled out. And remember the burning of wood causes other problems too. When I camp in the ADKs, I see pickup trucks on the Thruway piled up with wood taken from other places and brought to the ADKs and vice verse. This is a lovely way to transmit awful pests like the Emerald Ash borer beetle and other diseases.

So how come in all my time being around the “green” community, scarcely a mention of wood has come up? I have my own thought, but I’d like to hear yours. I do hope you understand that I am not serious about banning wood. Though maybe I should be in favor of wood burning standards at least for fireplaces and stoves in homes in densely populated communities. This is something that the local zoning and inspection czars have not gotten their paws on yet, strangely.

source ... r-evening/


A Colder Winter for San Francisco?
March 4th, 2013 BY Amy Anaruk | 1 Comment ...

• The Surgeon General has determined that there is no safe level of exposure to ambient smoke!

• If you smell even a subtle odor of smoke, you are being exposed to poisonous and carcinogenic chemical compounds!

• Even a brief exposure to smoke raises blood pressure, (no matter what your state of health) and can cause blood clotting, stroke, or heart attack in vulnerable people. Even children experience elevated blood pressure when exposed to smoke!

• Since smoke drastically weakens the lungs' immune system, avoiding smoke is one of the best ways to prevent colds, flu, bronchitis, or risk of an even more serious respiratory illness, such as pneumonia or tuberculosis! Does your child have the flu? Chances are they have been exposed to ambient smoke!
User avatar
Posts: 6106
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:36 pm
Location: USA

Return to Opinion Letters, Blogs, and Discussion Groups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests