Are the air districts really protecting us?

Personal Situations - Problems or Solutions.

Moderator: pm2.5mary

Are the air districts really protecting us?

Postby Wilberforce » Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:53 pm

Are the air districts really protecting us?

March 22, 2013 in Bay Area, Environmental Justice, EPA | Tags: Air District, air monitoring, Arvin, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, california, Central Valley, Environmental Justice, EPA, Global Community Monitor, pollution

How many of us have had to work with someone that just didn’t do their job?

In the professional world, we face this all of the time; and considering the lackluster economy, there’s probably someone ELSE out there that is more than willing to do the work.

Especially, when you’re paying them!

Well, when we’re talking about governmental agencies, it can be more complex because you can’t just fire a governmental agency.

I was at a community meeting a few weeks ago, where the Air District came out to discuss the local air quality amid deep community concerns over the presence of manganese in recent air samples.

The Air District dismissed the health concerns and telling the community that they have nothing to worry about since the manganese levels were below one health based standard, although above various other health based standards.

When a community member asked the air district staff if he would raise his children in the community based on the air quality. The answer was a resounding NO.

Needless to say after that, the meeting didn’t go so well.

After the (rightfully so) angry parents regained composure, one woman from the community stood to ask another question.

“You’re the air district, you care about clean air, right? So do we, but why do we have to fight you for our right to breathe clean air?”

Unfortunately, this can be the harsh reality when dealing with air pollution in Environmental Justice communities. Many residents are upset at the company because of a lack of communication, no emergency evacuation plan, lies about expansion plans, accidents, etc. Residents then turn to the regional air district for support. It seems like a natural ally in the fight for clean air. But the reality is that the air district is, most likely, not going to be an ounce of help.

This is extremely disempowering, especially since the Air District’s mandate is ensure our air is clean. That’s their job and that’s why we pay them!

Imagine if we were talking about a landscaper, a contractor or even a babysitter! If you came home one day to find your child bleeding, and the babysitter just said, “Oh, don’t worry about it,” would you invite the babysitter back?

Too bad we can’t do that with air districts and other governmental agencies.

We’ve seen this with other air districts and environmental agencies before. It’s not uncommon for them to discredit community based air monitoring results, while refusing to do their own air monitoring. If you want public information from the SJVAPCD about an facility’s emissions, good luck, and if you’re extremely persistent with the follow-up, you might even get a call from someone working at the agency, just to make sure you have the odor complaint line.

The agency folks assure you that they’re investigating your complaints and looking into your sample data, then months later- they claim that you never submitted your complaint or sent along your air monitoring data. “The investigation is closed…”

All of that will leave you sitting there, rereading the form email from the air district, knowing that the sample results you sent them are long lost somewhere at the air district along with your public info requests, most likely next to the phone in which you’ve left all of those odor complaint messages.

The problem here is that air districts and other environmental agencies often do not act as though they have the communities’ best interest in mind. The community meetings, public info requests and ‘on-going investigations’ act more like a smokescreen to make it look like they are doing their jobs.

The reality is, is that if they really did their jobs…………….

They’d have a lot more work to do! If the Air District acknowledged elevated levels of toxic substances in our air, they would have to do more comprehensive air monitoring. They’d need to work with residents to identify local hot spots and sensitive locations like schools and daycares. They’s need stricter regulations and stronger enforcement policies for polluters. BUT, no one wants to open that can of worms!

On the surface, no one wants to create more work for themselves and no one wants to illuminate a problem that requires money (that we don’t have!) to fix. Although there are also a series of deeper issues that can contribute to the agencies not doing an adequate job of protecting our safety.

We’ve seen a number of professionals move from governmental jobs to industry jobs and vise versa. We can’t help but wonder where their allegiances lie. On top of that we’ve got a lot of corporate donations and heavy lobbying on government by the very industries that are polluting our communities.

So, almost as if on cue, we’ll hear once again “The air’s fine. Keep calm and carry on.”

Now where do we go from here? How can we ensure that our air is safe for us and our children to breathe? Will it require long term reform of our governmental agencies or ongoing grassroots pressure from the communities living on the fenceline of heavy industry?

Either way, exposing this charade is a good place to start!

source ... ecting-us/

Environmental group charges that air agencies are not doing their jobs

Environmental News
March 22, 2013
By: Frank Maccioli

In a rather frank blog post published on March 22, 2013, an environmental justice group asserted that the public's rights to clean air were not being served by the local air pollution control agencies responsible for ensuring those rights. Additionally, the group went on to say that government responses to citizen concerns are no more than a "smokescreen to make it look like they are doing their jobs."

Global Community Monitor, an environmental justice group based in El Cerrito, CA, charged on its Air Hugger blog that the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) were not doing their jobs to protect citizens from harmful air pollutants being emitted by sources under their jurisdictions.

According to the website, the Air Hugger blog is written by Denny Larson, the Executive Director of Global Community Monitor. In the subject post he wrote that, "air districts and other environmental agencies often do not act as though they have the communities’ best interest in mind."

To support his charges, he referred to a meeting between concerned citizens and the BAAQMD to discuss levels of manganese found in air samples. He claimed that the BAAQMD said that there was no need for concern despite the fact that manganese levels exceeded some health standards.

Additionally, he accused the SJVAPCD of failing to provide requested information related to emissions from certain facilities, implying that the system is so rigged with red tape and fine print that obtaining such information is near impossible.

Larson wrote, "If you want public information from the SJVAPCD about an [sic] facility’s emissions, good luck, and if you’re extremely persistent with the follow-up, you might even get a call from someone working at the agency, just to make sure you have the odor complaint line."

He also went on to subtly suggest a too cozy relationship between the agencies and the industries they regulate, noting the recent hiring by Chevron of State Senator Michael Rubio (D-Shafter) and the large amounts of money donated to public officials by these same industries.

Finally, he went on to refer to the entire process as a "charade" that must be exposed to ensure that the air is safe to breathe.

source ... their-jobs
• The Surgeon General has determined that there is no safe level of exposure to ambient smoke!

• If you smell even a subtle odor of smoke, you are being exposed to poisonous and carcinogenic chemical compounds!

• Even a brief exposure to smoke raises blood pressure, (no matter what your state of health) and can cause blood clotting, stroke, or heart attack in vulnerable people. Even children experience elevated blood pressure when exposed to smoke!

• Since smoke drastically weakens the lungs' immune system, avoiding smoke is one of the best ways to prevent colds, flu, bronchitis, or risk of an even more serious respiratory illness, such as pneumonia or tuberculosis! Does your child have the flu? Chances are they have been exposed to ambient smoke!
User avatar
Posts: 6106
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:36 pm
Location: USA

Return to Opinion Letters, Blogs, and Discussion Groups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests